Full Transparency

    How We Detect Scams

    ScamCheckr is a pattern detector that analyzes observable signals to identify scams, phishing, and fraud so you can make informed decisions.

    Our Detection Methodology

    Every analysis runs through a rigorous detection framework. Our AI engine is trained to identify scam patterns, phishing indicators, and manipulation tactics using evidence-based signals:

    Evidence-Based Scoring

    Every piece of content starts at a neutral score. We add or subtract based on observable scam indicators — never assumptions.

    Pattern Recognition

    We compare content against thousands of known scam patterns, phishing templates, and fraud tactics to identify threats.

    Observational Language

    We use phrases like "consistent with scam patterns" and "indicators detected" rather than definitive judgments. You make the final call.

    Multi-Signal Analysis

    No single signal triggers a low score. We combine domain reputation, content analysis, manipulation tactics, and cross-references for accuracy.

    Transparency Over Certainty

    When confidence is limited, we say so. Our Data Confidence badge tells you exactly how much information was available for analysis.

    Trust Score Breakdown

    The Trust Score is a composite rating from 0 to 100, calculated by weighing the results of each analysis module. A higher score means fewer scam indicators were detected.

    80–100
    Low Risk

    Content appears legitimate with strong sourcing, verified domain, and no significant scam indicators detected.

    60–79
    Mostly Safe

    Generally credible but may have minor concerns — unverified claims, light promotional language, or incomplete disclosure.

    40–59
    Use Caution

    Notable concerns detected. May include misleading framing, pressure tactics, or suspicious payment requests.

    20–39
    High Risk

    Multiple scam indicators present — phishing patterns, fake urgency, undisclosed promotions, or impersonation tactics.

    0–19
    Likely Scam

    Content matches known scam patterns and is almost certainly deceptive or fraudulent. Do not engage.

    What We Analyze

    Every analysis runs through up to 9 independent modules. Each produces its own findings and confidence level, which are combined into the final Trust Score.

    Phishing Detection

    Checks URLs against known phishing databases, analyzes domain age, SSL certificates, and link patterns to identify fake or malicious websites.

    AI-Generated Scam Content

    Identifies AI-generated text and images commonly used in scam emails, fake reviews, and fraudulent product listings.

    Hidden Promotions & Payment Traps

    Detects undisclosed advertisements, fake payment pages, affiliate scams, and deceptive checkout flows designed to steal financial information.

    Source Credibility

    Evaluates the publishing source — domain age, verification status, editorial reputation, and whether the site appears on known scam registries.

    Red Flag Analysis

    Flags urgency tactics, too-good-to-be-true offers, impersonation, missing contact info, and other hallmarks of fraudulent content.

    Emotional Manipulation

    Detects psychological tactics including fake urgency, fear, guilt, false authority, scarcity appeals, and romance scam patterns.

    Synthetic Media Detection

    Analyzes video and image content for AI-generated or manipulated media commonly used in impersonation scams, fake endorsements, and deepfake fraud.

    Account Insights

    Profiles the publishing account — age, type, engagement patterns, follower ratios, and behavioral signals indicating bot or scam activity.

    News Cross-Reference

    Cross-checks claims against trusted news databases and fact-checking organizations to verify legitimacy of offers and claims.

    Data Sources & Cross-References

    Key claims are cross-checked against established verification databases and domain reputation registries. When a claim matches a known report, we link directly to the source with a reference badge.

    Snopes
    Verification
    PolitiFact
    Verification
    Reuters Fact Check
    Verification
    FullFact
    Verification
    Google Scholar
    Academic
    PubMed
    Academic
    WHOIS Records
    Domain Data
    Web Archive
    Historical

    Data Confidence Levels

    Not all content provides the same amount of analyzable data. We always tell you how much information was available with a transparency badge on every report.

    Full

    Rich content with text, metadata, domain info, and verifiable claims. Highest analysis accuracy.

    Partial

    Some data available but missing key signals — e.g., no domain info or limited text. Findings may have gaps.

    Limited

    Minimal analyzable content — image-only, very short text, or heavily obfuscated. Treat findings with extra caution.

    Got a suspicious link?

    Paste any URL, upload a screenshot of an email, or submit suspicious text — your first 3 analyses each day are free.

    Start Analyzing